In the last two months we have seen concerted attempts at reviving global trade talks which collapsed in Cancun, Mexico last year. This article from the SEATINI bulletin argues that the Doha round cannot be about anything other than development. At any rate, the Marrakesh Agreement which established the WTO speaks of a “need for positive efforts designed to ensure that developing countries and especially the least developed countries among them secure a share in growth in international trade commensurate with the needs of their economic development.” The outcome of any negotiations cannot be considered legitimate if they trash the concerns of the poor countries.
Health equity in economic and trade policies
In a repeat of a crisis a decade ago, donors now fear that the IMF is blocking aid increases to Mozambique. With public pressure in several European countries for increased aid, and with problems in Ethiopia and Uganda tainting these former donor darlings, donors are anxious to pump more money into Mozambique -- especially as budget support. But the IMF says no -- it will not allow Mozambique to accept more budget support. Instead, it wants donors to fund more projects outside the state budget -- which goes directly against the policy of many donors.
With the Biden-Harris Administration taking the United States out of the "blocking" countries, all eyes are now on Europe and Japan among others as momentum grows for text-based negotiations on the temporary TRIPS waiver for combating the Covid-19 pandemic. The World Trade Organisation director-general Ms Okonjo-Iweala met with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the TRIPS waiver is likely to have been included in the talks cannot be ruled out in the wake of a global call from 100 former leaders, including half of the US Democratic Congressmen and women, Nobel Laureates, and around 400 international civil society organizations, to agree to the TRIPS waiver. The EU's evolving positions seem to be focused on a "third way" approach—promoted by the European Union and several members of the Ottawa Group- that seeks to address issues such as export restrictions, more bilateral and other licensing agreements, and ensuring the supply of vaccines by countries which have huge stocks of unused vaccines. The authors note that the insistence on a "360 degree view" on the waiver could involve a payment from the waiver co-sponsors, as powerful pharmaceutical companies have also stepped up their campaign against the waiver.
This letter to the editor in the Financial Times expresses concern over Economic Partnership Agreements being negotiated between the EU and its African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) trading partners. The group of writers claim that the Commission is incorrect to claim that it has no legal choice but to raise tariffs in January 2008, and further recommend that instead of making threats, the Commission should focus on creating accords with the ACP that would genuinely support development.
After a year of stalled deliberations on the issue of protecting traditional knowledge, genetic resources and traditional cultural expressions, delegates at the World Intellectual Property Organization General Assemblies on 1 October found a compromise text that gives the committee its strongest mandate yet. The new Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC) agreement is to undertake text-based negotiations that will eventually become an ‘international legal instrument (or instruments)’ to ‘ensure the effective protection of’ traditional knowledge, genetic resources and traditional cultural expressions (folklore). It also lists three texts – containing language in the format of a possible draft instrument – that will form the basis of those negotiations, though it does not limit negotiations to just those texts. It also says there will be three inter-sessional working groups during the next biennium to accelerate the work.
The global strategy on public health, innovation and intellectual property aims to promote new thinking on innovation and access to medicines, as well as, provide a medium-term framework for securing an enhanced and sustainable basis for needs driven essential health research and development relevant to diseases which disproportionately affect developing countries, proposing clear objectives and priorities for Research and Development, and estimating funding needs in this area. In resolution WHA59.24 the Health Assembly recognised the growing burden of diseases and conditions that disproportionately affect developing countries, and particularly women and children. Reducing the very high incidence of communicable diseases in those countries is an overriding priority. At the same time, it is important for WHO Member States and the WHO Secretariat to recognise and better address the increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases in those countries. This document serves as the outcome-document of the agreements made on 3 May 2008.
A growing concern among those interested in economic development is the realisation that hundreds of billions of dollars are illicitly flowing out of developing countries to tax havens and other financial centres in the developed world. This new book by the World Bank assesses the dynamics of these flows, much of which is from corruption and tax evasion. What causes them, what are their consequences and how might they be controlled? The chapters by authors from a variety of backgrounds, including criminologists and practicing lawyers as well as economists, examine many dimensions of the phenomenon. Some chapters examine major illegal markets (drug trafficking and human smuggling) to assess how they contribute to these flows, while others are concerned with the corporate role in the phenomenon, particularly the possibility that transfer pricing (in which firms set prices for international trade among wholly owned affiliates) might play a major role in moving money illicitly.
This excerpt contains the text of United Nations (UN) Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s remarks at the official launch of UNITAID, the International Drug Purchase Facility, in New York today, 19 September. The Secretary General began by acknowledging this international facility for the purchase of drugs as a shining example of an innovative source of funding that can help us reach the Millennium Development Goals. The full speech can be found at the weblink above.
On 18 May 2012, a few days before the 2012 World Health Assembly, the permanent mission of Brazil organised an informal meeting on sanitary regulation and how to improve global cooperation among drug regulatory agencies. Margaret Chan, Secretary-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO), discussed the WHO drug prequalification programme, which she said was intended to give the opportunity for manufacturers from low- and middle-income countries to enter the market with straight quality and safety standards, and to enter into fair competition with other manufacturers. Many countries lacked capacity to pre-qualify their medical products, such as vaccines, as they did not have a functional national drug regulatory authority. These authorities often lacked resources and support from government and other stakeholders. Medicins sans Frontiers voiced its support for regional cooperation between regulatory agencies, adding that WHO should continue the development of norms and standards for phamacovigilence and support their implementation at country level. The Indian delegation identified lack of harmonisation of regulatory systems as a challenge and argued for the exchange and sharing of information among drug regulatory agencies.
In the run-up to the United Nations (UN) Climate Change Conference, hosted in South Africa from 28 November-9 December 2011, the author of this article points to the ‘David and Goliath’ nature of the Conference as civil society faces the industrial giants of the first world, with the poor of the developing world on the sidelines. The failure of Durban’s COP17 is certain, the author agues. Binding emissions-cutting commitments under the Kyoto Protocol are impossible, given Washington’s push for an alternative global architecture that is inequitable to developing countries. The author expressed concern about plans for climate finance and technology, which include an extension of private-sector profit-making opportunities at public expense. Politically, the author argues that global climate policy makers, especially from the United States State Department and the World Bank, will aim to distract global attention from any potential overall UN solution to the climate crisis, from the severe global power imbalance between nations and from the progressive demands and solutions by civil society, which include demands for a better environment in townships, including increased housing, electricity, water and sanitation, and improved waste removal, healthcare and education. ‘Connecting the dots’ to climate will be the primary challenge for all attendees at the Conference, the author notes.
