Global life expectancy could be increased by nearly five years by addressing five factors affecting health – childhood underweight, unsafe sex, alcohol use, lack of safe water, sanitation and hygiene, and high blood pressure, according to this report. These are responsible for one-quarter of the 60 million deaths estimated to occur annually. The report describes 24 factors affecting health, which are a mix of environmental, behavioural and physiological factors, such as air pollution, tobacco use and poor nutrition. More than a third of the global child deaths can be attributed to a few nutritional risk factors such as childhood underweight, inadequate breastfeeding and zinc deficiency. Eight risk factors alone account for over 75% of cases of coronary heart disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. These are alcohol consumption, high blood glucose, tobacco use, high blood pressure, high body mass index, high cholesterol, low fruit and vegetable intake and physical inactivity. Most of these deaths occur in developing countries.
Equity in Health
Global life expectancy could be increased by nearly five years by addressing five factors affecting health – childhood underweight, unsafe sex, alcohol use, lack of safe water, sanitation and hygiene, and high blood pressure, according to this report. These are responsible for one-quarter of the 60 million deaths estimated to occur annually. The report describes 24 factors affecting health, which are a mix of environmental, behavioural and physiological factors, such as air pollution, tobacco use and poor nutrition. More than a third of the global child deaths can be attributed to a few nutritional risk factors such as childhood underweight, inadequate breastfeeding and zinc deficiency. Eight risk factors alone account for over 75% of cases of coronary heart disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. These are alcohol consumption, high blood glucose, tobacco use, high blood pressure, high body mass index, high cholesterol, low fruit and vegetable intake and physical inactivity. Most of these deaths occur in developing countries.
Five leading risk factors identified in this report (childhood underweight, unsafe sex, alcohol use, unsafe water and sanitation, and high blood pressure) are responsible for one quarter of all deaths in the world, and one fifth of all DALYs. Reducing exposure to these risk factors would increase global life expectancy by nearly five years. Eight risk factors (alcohol use, tobacco use, high blood pressure, high body mass index, high cholesterol, high blood glucose, low fruit and vegetable intake, and physical inactivity) account for 61% of cardiovascular deaths. Combined, these same risk factors account for over three quarters of ischaemic heart disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. Reducing exposure to these eight risk factors would increase global life expectancy by almost five years. Low- and middle-income countries now face a double burden of increasing chronic, non-communicable conditions, as well as the communicable diseases that traditionally affect the poor. Understanding the role of these risk factors is important for developing clear and effective strategies for improving global health.
Global civil society does not participate strongly and consistently in international health advocacy. Whilst high-profile success has recently been achieved with the campaigns on access to medicines and the past twenty years have seen positive achievements due to pressure from civil society (for example, on breastfeeding and smoking), there is a striking lack of involvement and pressure from health campaigners on broad health and health systems issues. Where such pressures exist, they are inadequately drawn upon by the institutions of global health governance – notably the World Health Organisation – whose legitimacy and accountability to the world’s population would be enhanced by more vigorous engagement with civil society.
Under-nutrition seems to be inexplicable in a world where the food market ascends to the 11% of the global trade and food prices have declined over the last years. Nevertheless it is one of the most important causes of illness and death globally as well as a key factor in poverty reproduction. This is according to a chapter in the Global Health Watch 2005 report. The chapter looks at the underlying causes of under and over nourishment both in developing and developed countries as directly related to the globalisation and liberalisation processes that have been taken place in the last decades. You can read the newsletter of the Global Health Watch and find out how to subscribe through the link below.
The Global Health Watch for 2005-2006 looks at some of the most important problems, suggests solutions, and monitors the efforts of institutions and governments concerned with promoting health world-wide. This report arises out of many civil society and professional campaigns and struggles for better health, and has been released to coincide with the Second People's Health Assembly, held in Cuenca, Ecuador, at which two thousand people from across the world have gathered to discuss and debate strategies to overcome the political, economic and social barriers to better and fairer health.
At the World Health Assembly in May 2003, the People's Health Movement, together with GEGA and Medact discussed the need for civil society to produce its own alternative World Health Report. It was felt that the WHO reports were inadequate; that there was no report that monitored the performance of global health institutions; and, that the dominant neo-liberal discourse in public health policy also needed to be challenged by a more people-centred approach that highlights social justice. The idea of an alternative World Health Report since developed into an initiative called the 'Global Health Watch' the first of which was launched on July 20, 2005.
According to this presentation, over the long run, the importance of within-country inequalities has decreased and the importance of between-country inequalities has increased, while the global division between countries is actually greater than that between social classes. The presentation refers to two factors affecting an individual’s levels of wealth: citizenship premium and parental premium. According to citizenship premium, if the mean income of country where you live increases by 10%, your income goes up by about 10% too (called ‘unitary elasticity’). The parental premium states that, if your parents are one income class higher, your income increases by about 10.5% on average. In terms of global inequality of opportunity, country of citizenship explains 60% of variability in global income, while citizenship and parental income class combined explain more than 80%. In conclusion, if most of one’s income is determined by citizenship, then there is little equality of opportunity globally and citizenship may be regarded as a rent (unrelated to individual effort or whether or not the individual deserves it or not).
This paper offers an overview of calculations of global inequality, recently and over the long-run as well as main controversies and political and philosophical implications of the findings. The author focuses in particular on the winners and losers of the most recent episode of globalisation, from 1988 to 2008. He suggests that the period might have witnessed the first decline in global inequality between world citizens since the Industrial Revolution. The decline however can be sustained only if countries’ mean incomes continue to converge (as they have been doing during the past ten years) and if internal (within-country) inequalities, which are already high, are kept in check. Mean-income convergence would also reduce the huge “citizenship premium” that is enjoyed today by the citizens of rich countries.
Using social tables, the author estimates global inequality (inequality among world citizens) from the early 19th century until the 21st century. The analysis shows that the level and composition of global inequality have changed over the past two centuries. The level has increased, reaching a high plateau around the 1950s, and the main determinants of global inequality have become differences in mean country incomes rather than inequalities within nations. The inequality extraction ratio (the percentage of total inequality that was extracted by global elites) has remained surprisingly stable, at around 70% of the maximum global Gini co-efficient, during the past 100 years.